History of Colonialism

One hundred and sixty-nine years after colonial scholars first started rewriting India’s history, most Indians still don’t know the full story of colonialism.

Illustration: “Types de nez, de profil” from Éléments d’anthropologie générale

By Pseudo-Mary Elliott and Jazmine Hughes
Published April 20, 2023

Sometime in 1854, an English history book, Outlines of the Philosophy of Universal History, Applied to Language and Religion, was published in the City of London, advertised as the essential facts in the emerging science of speech. Contained in the work was a nine-page section on “The Arian Settlers and Aboriginal Races of India” that claimed Sanskrit had been introduced in India by conquerors in some very remote age. The argument, likely borrowing from earlier research in racial classification in India, depended almost entirely on re-interpreting the Sanskrit word anâsas in liturgical texts to mean “noseless.” The colonial administrator Sir Herbert Hope Risley, working almost forty years after, later remarked “[n]o one can have glanced at the literature of the subject and in particular at the Vedic accounts of the Aryan advance without being struck by the frequent references to the noses of the people whom the Aryans found in possession of the plains of India.” Measurements of noses were soon after used to order the patchwork of caste reporting practices in the 1901 Census of India.

These peculiar events were part of the pattern of colonialism. Universal histories were not uncommon—the Bible had been studied and debated in Europe for ages—but they had not been based on race. Colonial scholarship, which grew out of studia humanitatis (“studies of humanity” or the Humanities) during the early modern era, developed the idea of race in response to European colonialism, enabling in certain important ways forms of social existence that were commercialized, racialized and inherited. Large bodies of people—in some cases entire regions—came to be seen not as part of society at all but as commodities to be bought, sold and exploited. Though India had a long tradition of writing history, the nine-page section would nonetheless set the course for enduring perceptions of India as uniquely divided and oppressive.

The broadside pictured above shows a figure from Éléments d’anthropologie générale published in 1885 classifying ethnicity based on the ratio of the breadth of a nose to its height. Developed by the French anthropologist/anthropometrist Paul Topinard, “narrow” noses (Types 1–5) indicate European origin; “medium” noses (Type 6) are the “yellow races”; and “broad” are either African (Type 7) or Melanesian and Australian aboriginal (Type 8).

No. 1/ Justice, War, and the Imperium 

In the 15th century, the campaigns to ‘retake’ Iberia from the Moors—the Reconquista—began moving southwards into the coast of Africa. These campaigns, despite sharing many similarities with earlier expansions, started diverging from Christendom in Europe. In 1526, Nzinga Mbemba (Afonso I), the King of Kongo, wrote a letter to João III, the King of Portugal, recording frustration about the permissiveness with which Portuguese trading agents established shops and the destabilizing effects of the salve trade. Later Pope Paul III, responding to more reports of abuse in the Indies, issued Sublimis Deus in 1537, declaring Indians and all other people who may be discovered were not to be “deprived of their liberty or the possession of their property.“ The papal bull, however, was largely circumvented, and later ignored as slavery became central to the Atlantic Economy. Eventually other European powers — the Netherlands, France, and England — began seeking overseas colonies similar to Portugal and Spain. With these efforts, a new model of power came into being. It was endorsed by the European powers and based on race, and it resulted in one of the most harrowing periods in history. Tens of millions of people died not only from disease and malnutrition but also brutal working conditions in European colonies. The exploitation of colonized regions helped bring the modern world into being, including colonial empires. In the colonized world, status began to be defined by race and class, and whether by custom, case law or statue, freedom was limited to maintain the enterprise of colonialism and ensure power.

De Insulis inventis

A Tale of Two Indias

Cultivating Wealth and Power

The Treaty of Allahabad (1765) transformed the East India Company (EIC) from a joint-stock company into a state actor, the Mughal Emperor assigning the right to collect revenue in Bengal, Bihar and Odisha to the EIC—“nothing remaining to him [the Soubah of these Provinces] but the Name and Shadow of Authority”—EIC officers later transforming the grant into a license to exercise arbitrary power in India, thus beginningthat career of illegal and legal plunder.’

Means of Control

Dependency Theory: Extractive

No. 2/ Monastic Governmentality, Colonial Misogyny, and Postcolonial Amnesia in South Asia  

Utalitarianism

Asiatick Society/Sanskrit College

Minute on Education

Brahmo Samaj

Colonial scholarship was “a continuation of political commerce, a carrying out of the same by other means” intended to obviate native scholars and promote a new national literature “impregnated with Western ideas, yet retaining its native spirit and character“— figuratively (and literally) relocating symbolic authority in India by appealing to, and constructing, the dogma, ‘the history of human civilization as a trajectory departed from a state of nature and culminated in Europe.’

No. 3/ ‘Time-Sense’: Railways and Temporality in Colonial India  

“Modernity“

Minute on Railways

Colonial Ecology

Asiatic Mode of Production

The steamboats, railways, and telegraph reconfigured India’s political economy in gross ways, the outward appearance of benevolence obscuring their economic structure was a drain on India’s economypart of a program fordrawing up riches from the banks of the Ganges and, squeezing them down upon the banks of the Thames“— the unequal terms acting to deepen India’s transformation “from a manufacturing country into a country exporting raw produce,” exacerbating social tensions and increasing economic dependency.

No. 4/ Historians and Historiography: Situating 1857  

Doctrine of Lapse

Princely States

Civilizing Mission

Siege of Cawnpore

The many interpretations of the Sepoy Mutiny and the Revolt of 1857 within India’s national literature reflect the event(s) undecided place in India’s history—from “the last effort of the dethroned feudal potentates to regain their power“ to a vast upsurge against colonial rule—stemming from a fractured national historiography and the knot of a colonial discourse prefacing the event(s) as “the most signal illustration of our [English] great national character ever yet recorded.“

No. 5/ The Politics of Identity and Enumeration in India c. 1600-1990

Caste Encoded Into History

The spread of the loanword caste, from the Iberian casta, in India reveals the degree to which British attempts to catalog Indian society as “petrified in the merely natural classification” succeeded in giving legal form to colonial scholarship—locating the cause of India’s predicament to an imaginary past, even as colonial administrators argued elsewhere “in India, that haughty spirit, independence, and deep thought, which the possession of great wealth sometimes gives, ought to be suppressed.”

Bengal Partition

Deobandi Movement

Ramakrishna Mission

No. 6/ Indian Nationalism 1885-1905 

Print Culture

National Party

Non-Violent Movement

Discovery of India

The creation of the Republic of India marked the culmination of a multigenerational freedom struggle—representing a new compact calling on the people of India “to build the noble mansion of free India where all her children may dwell,” tempered by a partition displacing millions in the Name of a Two Nation Theory—a coincidence of opposites underscoring competing ideas on national identity that continue to shape politics in India and abroad.

No. 7/ Postcolonial Criticism and Indian Historiography

Partition of India

“Third World“

Indian Cinema

Secularism

The historiography of the Long Peace masksa condition of Warre of every one against every one” that has made the job of know thyself difficult for every one—the celebrants, for whom such “traumas are no more than occasions for it [the ego] to gain pleasure,” and the discontents, who take arms against “a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity“—can rewriting history from outside its inherited dogmas serve as a panaceas to the crisis of the modern world?